Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Campbell [2019] FCA 886 File number(s): VID 612 of 2019
Judge(s): O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 7 June 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application by ACCC for freezing orders – alleged contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law – whether freezing orders should be made – whether ancillary disclosure orders should be made – whether ACCC required to provide undertaking as to damages
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 137F Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Div 7.4, rr 7.32, 7.33, 7.34
Cases cited: ACCC v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (2016) 244 FCR 538 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Basi v Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 743 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad (2010) 273 ALR 194 Donnelly v Porteous [2001] FCA 345 Hyder Consulting (Victoria) Pty Ltd v Transfield Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 315 Pearce v Waterhouse [1986] VR 603 PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd (2015) 258 CLR 1 Robmatjus Pty Ltd v Violet Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 165
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate