Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gambaro v Mobycom Mobile Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 910 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Gambaro v Mobycom Mobile Pty Ltd & Ors [2018] FCCA 3360
File number: QUD 804 of 2018
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 14 June 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time for leave to appeal from interlocutory orders of Federal Circuit Court of Australia – procedural fairness – allegations of apprehended bias and unfair conduct by primary judge – extension allowed – leave to appeal allowed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 340 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Rule 35.13(a)
Cases cited: Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Data Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Ellis v R [2015] NSWCA 262 Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 Royal Guardian Mortgage Management Pty Ltd v Nguyen [2016] NSWCA 88 RPS v R (2000) 199 CLR 620 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86
Date of hearing: 25 March 2019
Registry: Queensland
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate