Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Key Logic Pty Ltd v Blue Groper Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCA 926 File number(s): QUD 605 of 2016
Judge(s): DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2019
Catchwords: COSTS – whether lump sum costs order should be made – whether any reason demonstrated that order should not be made – good reasons established – lump sum costs orders to be assessed by District Registrar
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Central Practice Note: National Court Framework and Case Management Costs Practice Note
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd (2012) 290 ALR 288 Bobb v Wombat Securities Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 863 Key Logic Pty Ltd v Blue Groper Investments Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 275 Key Logic Pty Ltd v Blue Groper Pty Ltd (2019) 139 IPR 140 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) (2017) 253 FCR 403
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 14 May 2019
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate