Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CCA19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 939 File number: VID 552 of 2019
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 13 June 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction to remove the applicant from Nauru so that he can receive appropriate mental health treatment – where interlocutory relief granted that required the respondent to take all reasonable steps to transfer the applicant and his uncle from Nauru to a place where he can receive urgent medical attention – where applicant still on Nauru – where issues raised as to the Court's jurisdiction to hear such matters – whether the Court should make further and more specific orders to give effect to the orders previously made for interlocutory relief.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 494AB
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 AWB Ltd v Honourable Terence Rhoderic Hudson Cole (No 4) [2006] FCA 1050 AYX18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 283 BAF18 as litigation representative for BAG18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1060 BKP19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 761 CDO19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 890 D7 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 244 FCR 1 DCQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 918 DJA18 as litigation representative for DIZ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1050 DRB18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1163 EHW18 v Minister for Home Affairs (2018) 262 FCR 27 ELF18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1368 FRX17 as litigation representative for FRM17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 63 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1 Plaintiff S99/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 17 R v Ross-Jones; Ex parte Green (1984) 156 CLR 185 Romaldi Constructions Pty Ltd v Adelaide Interior Linings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] SASCFC 124
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate