Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agnish Pty Limited v Folio Invest Pty Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 1041 File number: NSD 1006 of 2018
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 2 July 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for deemed service and substituted service under rr 10.48 and 10.49 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the third respondent resides in Sierra Leone – where four attempts to personally serve the third respondent in Sierra Leone were unsuccessful – where the third respondent has previously filed a defence and an affidavit on behalf of the first and second respondents – interlocutory application granted – orders made in accordance with the applicant's short minutes of order
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 10.48, 10.49
Date of hearing: 2 Jul 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 3
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J R Anderson
Solicitor for the Applicant: Lazarus Legal Group Pty Limited
Counsel for the Respondents: The respondents did not appear
ORDERS NSD 1006 of 2018
BETWEEN: AGNISH PTY LIMITED (ACN 082 620 559) Applicant
AND: FOLIO INVEST PTY LIMITED (ACN 150 171 252) First Respondent
FOLIO PROPERTY PTY LIMITED (ACN 144 632 413) Second Respondent
BRADLEY CLIVE JAMES BILBIE Third Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 2 July 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to r 10.48 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the following documents be taken to have been served on the third respondent, Bradly Clive James Bilbie, on the following dates: (a) the originating application dated 12 June 2018 be taken to have been served on 18 July 2018; (b) the statement of claim dated 12 June 2018 be taken to have been served on 18 July 2018; (c) the affidavit of Arun Aggarwal affirmed on 19 February 2019 and exhibit AA-1 to that affidavit be taken to have been served on 26 April 2019, (together, the Documents). 2. Pursuant to r 10.49 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the applicant may serve copies of: (a) the amended interlocutory application dated 21 August 2018; and (b) the orders made by Griffiths J in this proceeding on 11 December 2018, by email to (c) brad.bilbie@folioinvest.com.au; and (d) bradbilbie@gmail.com 3. By 8:00pm (AEST) on 2 July 2019, the applicant is to serve a copy of these orders and on the respondents by email to: (a) brad.bilbie@folioinvest.com.au; and (b) bradbilbie@gmail.com 4. By 8:00pm (AEST) on 5 July 2019, the applicant is to serve a copy of the reasons for judgement for these orders on the respondents by email to: (a) brad.bilbie@folioinvest.com.au; and (b) bradbilbie@gmail.com 5. Until, such time as the third respondent files a notice of address for service, or further order, service by the applicant of any further documents in this proceeding may be effected by the applicant sending a copy of such documents to the third respondent by email to the email address brad.bilbie@folioinvest.com.au and bradbilbie@gmail.com. 6. The costs of the interlocutory application filed on 1 July 2019 be costs in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate