Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FIG17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1105 Appeal from: FIG17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 3751
File number: WAD 621 of 2018
Judge: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia - application for judicial review - decision of Immigration Assessment Authority - protection visa - irrationality - new information under s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - failure to consider integer of claim - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB(1)(a) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 65, 473CC, 473DB, 473DC, 473DD, 473EA, 476, Part 7AA Div 3 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) r 4.43
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593 AQU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 111 BVD17 v Minister For Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 114; (2018) 261 FCR 35 BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958; (2017) 254 FCR 221 CHF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 192; (2017) 257 FCR 148 CNN16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1526 Dranichikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 197 ALR 389 ETA067 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 46; (2018) 360 ALR 228 FJW17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 881 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802; (2001) 233 FCR 136 Maan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 150; (2009) 179 FCR 581 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176; (2017) 257 FCR 111 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CQW17 [2018] FCAFC 110 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v EEI17 [2018] FCAFC 166; (2018) 261 FCR 461 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 363 ALR 599 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang [2003] HCA 11; (2003) 215 CLR 518 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 MZZGE v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 72 NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 353 ALR 600 R v Kelly [2000] QB 198 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate