Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Combis (Trustee) v Brent, in the matter of Combis [2019] FCA 1122 File number: QUD 558 of 2017
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 24 July 2019
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – Sections 120 and 121 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) – second respondent claims equitable interest in family farm provided adequate consideration for payments made to her by bankrupt – undervalued transfers of property – transfers to defeat creditors
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 120 and 121 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 90
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Piggott Wood and Baker (A Firm) (No 6) [2019] FCA 672 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac (2008) 39 WAR 1 Donis v Donis (2007) 19 VR 577 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 Lane v Oakley #1 [2019] FCA 107 Lane v Oakley (No 2) [2019] FCA 488 Lo Pilato (Trustee) v Kamy Saeedi Lawyers Pty Ltd (2017) 249 FCR 69 Marchesi v Apostolou [2007] FCA 986 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Mateo (2003) 127 FCR 217 Official Trustee v Lopatinsky (2003) 129 FCR 234 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Grellman (1992) 35 FCR 515 Re Jury; Ashton v Prentice (1999) 92 FCR 68 Sargent v ASL Developments Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634 Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate