Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mitolo Wines Aust Pty Ltd v Vito Mitolo & Son Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1140 File number: SAD 340 of 2016
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 25 July 2019
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS — where the applicants seek declarations and injunctions with respect to trade mark infringement — whether an injunction granted pursuant to s 126 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) can and should be expressed in terms of the applicants' statutory monopoly or in terms of the particular conduct found to be infringing conduct — where the applicants also seek an order with respect to their applications for registration of other marks CONSUMER LAW — where the applicants seek declarations and injunctions with respect to contraventions of ss 18 and 29(1)(h) of the Australian Consumer Law — whether an injunction granted pursuant to s 232 of the Australian Consumer Law should be expressed in terms of the conduct giving rise to the contravention — where the applicants also seek delivery up pursuant to the Court's general powers and pursuant to s 238 and s 243(d) of the Australian Consumer Law, or removal of the infringing words — whether the Court should make an order for delivery up when the order will result in the delivery up of valuable commercial property COSTS — where the applicants seek an order with respect to costs — whether the respondents should be ordered to pay the applicants' costs of and incidental to the trial
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ss 18, 29, 232, 238, 243 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 126
Cases cited: Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé SA (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 153; (2015) 327 ALR 630 Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] RPC 9 Colbeam Palmer Ltd v Stock Affiliates Pty Ltd (1970) 122 CLR 25 Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v MWA Holdings Pty Ltd (1970) 180 CLR 160 Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencers plc (No 2) [2014] FSR 3 Interlego AG v Toltoys Pty Ltd (1973) 130 CLR 461 Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Limited (2001) 205 CLR 1 Mitolo Wines Aust Pty Ltd v Vito Mitolo & Son Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 902 Playgro Pty Ltd v Playgo Art & Craft Manufactory Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 478 Roussel Uclaf v Pan Laboratories Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 316 Solarhart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 780; (2011) 282 ALR 43 Streetworx Pty Ltd v Artcraft Urban Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 140; (2015) 322 ALR 557 Sun Microsystems Inc v Airtech Computer Corp Ltd [2006] FSR 35 Welch Perrin & Co Pty Ltd v Worrel (1961) 106 CLR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate