Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
EJJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1296 Appeal from: EJJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 230
File number: NSD 263 of 2019
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 15 August 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for review of decision of Immigration Assessment Authority affirming delegate's decision not to grant a safe haven enterprise visa to the appellant - where leave sought to raise three new grounds - where no explanation as to why new grounds were not raised before the primary judge - where new grounds without merit - leave to raise new grounds refused - whether the Authority failed to consider the position of the appellant in the future - whether the Authority was bound to consider the position if it was wrong as to the factual findings concerning the appellant - where the Authority made clear findings about the aspects of the claim that were not accepted - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473DC, 473DD
Cases cited: BZD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 94; (2018) 263 FCR 292 CDW18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 270 CHZ19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 914 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; (2018) 258 FCR 175 DGZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 12; (2018) 258 FCR 551 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 43 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo [1997] HCA 22; (1997) 191 CLR 559 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16 SZGHS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1572
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate