Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Penalty Stay Application) [2019] FCA 1317 Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies) [2019] FCA 786
File number: NSD 1011 of 2019
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 9 August 2019
Date of publication of reasons: 20 August 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for stay of penalty order – where primary judge ordered pecuniary penalty of $19 million – where appeal filed against penalty judgment – where Appellant alleging inability to pay – where Respondent willing to consent to further extension to pay PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for suppression order under Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AF – where affidavit evidence concerning financial position of Appellant – consideration of relevant principles
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 45 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 41.06
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Parish [1980] FCA 40; 29 ALR 228 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; 240 CLR 651
Date of hearing: 9 August 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate