Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Frigger v Banning (No 8) [2019] FCA 1319 File number: WAD 607 of 2015
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to amend statement of claim and add additional respondents - where proposed statement of claim involved a wholesale change to the application - where proposed statement of claim raised new claims alleging defamation and malicious prosecution - whether proposed statement of claim failed to comply with previous orders - whether steps could be taken in the proceedings by the applicants as bankrupts - application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to substitute executor of deceased estate in place of deceased respondent - application allowed BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - where applicants are bankrupts - whether the claims in the proceedings are of a kind that can be advanced by the applicants as bankrupts - where statutory stay of all proceedings - consideration of s 60 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - where proceedings deemed to have been abandoned by trustee in bankruptcy -consideration of effect of deemed abandonment of proceedings for present application - whether certain claims are in respect of a personal injury or wrong and subject to the exception in s 60(4)
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 60, 116 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 9.09, 9.24
Cases cited: A v New South Wales [2007] HCA 10; (2007) 230 CLR 500 Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 5; (2004) 218 CLR 366 Bell v Cribb [2013] WASC 32 Cole v Challenge Bank Limited [2002] FCAFC 200 Cox v Journeaux (No 2) [1935] HCA 48; (1935) 52 CLR 713 Duckworth v Water Corporation [2012] WASC 30 Eleizer v The Owners - Strata Plan No 51682 [2017] NSWSC 278 Freeman v Joiner [2005] FCAFC 149 Frigger v Banning (No 7) [2018] FCA 1074 Frigger v Banning [2016] FCA 359 Gore v Prentice (Trustee), in the matter of the Personal Insolvency Agreement of Gore [2012] FCA 660 Holbrook v Professional Services Australia Pty Ltd [2012] WASC 444 Jamieson v R [1993] HCA 48; (1993) 177 CLR 574 Kitay, in the matter of Frigger (No 2) [2018] FCA 1032 Little v Law Institute of Victoria (No 3) [1990] VR 257 Mann v O'Neill [1997] HCA 28; (1997) 191 CLR 204 McJannett v Daley [No 2] [2012] WASC 386 Moss v Eaglestone [2011] NSWCA 404; (2011) 83 NSWLR 476 National Australia Bank Ltd v Nyasa Nominees Pty Ltd [2019] WASC 107 Newman as trustee for the Bankrupt Estate of Keet v Bain [2013] FCA 558; (2013) 213 FCR 370 Nugawela v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 1458 Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57; (2002) 212 CLR 1 Savage v Australian Unity Funds Management Ltd [2011] NSWCA 270 The Beach Club Port Douglas Pty Ltd v Page [2005] QCA 475; [2006] 1 Qd R 307 Theissbacher v MacGregor Garrick & Co [1993] 2 Qd R 223 Tyne v UBS AG (No 4) [2017] FCA 374
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate