Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Boddu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1340 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Boddu v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2019] FCCA 879
File number: VID 392 of 2019
Judge: STEWARD J
Date of judgment: 20 August 2019
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 44.12 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) cl 485.213
Cases cited: Anand v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 215 FCR 562 Boddu v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2019] FCCA 879 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397
Date of hearing: 20 August 2019
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms S Roberts
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS VID 392 of 2019
BETWEEN: SRIVANTHI BODDU Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: STEWARD J DATE OF ORDER: 20 AUGUST 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal is refused with costs as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate