Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qudos Mutual Limited v Infosys Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 1373 File number: NSD 2075 of 2018
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 27 August 2019
Catchwords: COSTS – application for preliminary discovery pursuant to r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where prospective applicant was successful in obtaining discovery from first prospective respondent but in narrower categories than claimed – where further documents requested following an initial discovery – discretion in making costs orders pursuant to s 43(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 7.23
Cases cited: Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 657 Qudos Mutual Limited v Infosys Limited [2019] FCA 702
Date of hearing: 2 May 2019
Date of last submission: 11 June 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr R. Cobden SC with Mr P. Flynn
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the Prospective Respondents: Mr J. Hennessy SC with Mr C. Burgess
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate