Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BDT18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1393 Appeal from: BDT18 v Minister for Home Affairs and Anor [2019] FCCA 1013
File number: NSD 658 of 2019
Judge: STEWARD J
Date of judgment: 29 August 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether primary judge erred in dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority affirming a refusal of a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa application – where appellant sought to rely on an entirely new claim never raised before the Authority or the primary judge – where claim was not apparent on the face of the record – whether leave should be granted to rely on new ground
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5J, 36, 473DD
Cases cited: BFS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 142 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Perkins (1993) 26 ATR 8 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Raptis (1989) 19 ALD 726 Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 NAVK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1695 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 353 ALR 600 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 261 FCR 556 SZBZJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 771 SZLPH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 145
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate