Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 1441 File numbers: SAD 49 of 2017 NSD 1610 of 2016
Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 3 August 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether trial dates should be vacated having regard to the grant of leave to appeal interlocutory decision regarding discovery
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.23, 36.05
Cases cited: Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia [2019] FCA 1101 Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 96
Date of hearing: Heard and determined on the papers
Registry: South Australia
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 42
Counsel for Mr Martin: Mr Martin appeared in person
Counsel for Norton Rose Fulbright: Ms B Ng
Solicitor for Norton Rose Fulbright: King & Wood Mallesons
ORDERS SAD 49 of 2017
BETWEEN: THOMAS PATRICK MARTIN Applicant
AND: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT AUSTRALIA Respondent
JUDGE: KERR J DATE OF ORDER: 3 AUGUST 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The trial dates of 23-27 September 2019 be vacated. 2. The parties advise the Court of any unavailability for a five day trial during March 2020 by 4.00 pm on Friday 27 September 2019. 3. Costs be reserved. 4. There be liberty to apply. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate