Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FBR18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1620 Appeal from: FBR18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 963
File number(s): NSD 579 of 2019
Judge(s): FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 1 October 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to reject an application for a Safe Haven Enterprise (Class XE (subclass 790) visa – judicial review dismissed after show cause hearing pursuant to r 44.12(1)(a) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) – where applicant seeks to rely on new grounds of review that were not raised before the FCCA Judge – application dismissed and leave refused
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 44.12 and 44.13 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 473BA, 473CA, 473CB, 473DB, 473DC, 473DD and 473DE
Cases cited: ADN18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1677 ANO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 59 AOV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] 1871 ASW17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1815 BCV16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 365 BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958; 254 FCR 221 BZE18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 126 CAL15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1344 CCQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1641 CHF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 192; 257 FCR 148 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 46 CSR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 474 CVK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1434; 257 FCR 297 CVS16 v Minister for Immigration and Boarder Protection [2018] FCA 951 DAY16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1750 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCAFC 844; 33 FCR 397 DGZ16 v Minister f or immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 12; 258 FCR 551 DYK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 222 EXV17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1780 FBR18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 963 Han v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 331 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CLV16 [2018] FCAFC 80; 260 FCR 482 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210; 253 FCR 475 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DDK16 [2017] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16 Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc [2013] FCAFC 138 SZSTR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCCA 2554 SZTRG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 836 SZTZY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 911 United States Tobacco Co v Minister for Consumer Affairs [1988] FCA 213; 20 FCR 520 VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; 238 FCR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate