Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hastwell v Kott Gunning (No 3) [2019] FCA 1641 File number: NSD 714 of 2017
Judge: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 8 October 2019
Catchwords: DISCOVERY - itemisation of discovery lists under r 20.17 of Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - itemisation of privileged documents - dispensation from requirement under r 1.34 DISCOVERY - particular discovery under r 20.21 of Federal Court Rules - turns on own facts DISCOVERY - application for discovery of document filed in Supreme Court matter - implied undertaking - Harman principle - without prejudice communications
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 20.11, 20.14, 20.15, 20.17, 20.20, 20.21 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.12
Cases cited: 789TEN Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [2004] NSWSC 594 Akins v Abigroup Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 Alafaci v Mangano [2009] NSWSC 1131 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 32; (2009) 174 FCR 547 Australian Mud Co Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] FCA 663 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2002] NSWSC 198 Bourns v Raychem Corporation [No 3] [1999] 1 All ER 908 Buswell v Carles (No 2) [2013] WASC 54 Canberra Residential Developments Pty Limited v Brendas [2010] FCA 90 Coca-Cola Company v Pepsico Inc [2011] FCA 1069 Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Rio Tinto Coal Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 462; (2014) 232 FCR 560 Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 63; (2012) 201 FCR 321 Domain Paper (Australia) Pty Ltd v Galloway [2014] FCA 936 Dowling v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCAFC 28 Eisa Ltd v Brady [2000] NSWSC 929 Field v Commissioner for Railways for New South Wales (1957) 99 CLR 285 Georgiou v Spencer Holdings Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 1222 Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Lovell (1998) 19 WAR 316 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Helicopter Aerial Surveys Pty Ltd v Robertson [2015] NSWSC 2104 Independent Cement & Lime Pty Ltd v Australian Cement Ltd [1988] FCA 749 Kenquist Nominees Pty Ltd v Campbell (No 3) [2017] FCA 1230 Mulley & Marney v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Fountain Page Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 756 Re Universal Music (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sharman Licence Holdings Ltd; Ex parte Merlin BV [2008] FCA 783; (2008) 222 FCR 580 Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd [1977] QB 881 Samnakay v Schofield [2013] WASCA 138 Srotyr v Clissold [2015] NSWSC 1770 Tracenia Nominees Pty Ltd v Centro Properties Ltd [1993] FCA 996 Trade Practices Commission v CC (NSW) Pty Ltd (No 4) (1995) 58 FCR 426
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate