Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harvard Nominees Pty Ltd v Tiller [2019] FCA 1672 File number: WAD 250 of 2019
Judge: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application by respondents to set aside subpoenas under r 24.15 of Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - whether subpoenas have a legitimate forensic purpose - whether scope of subpoenas too wide - application successful in part
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 24.15
Cases cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Western Power Corporation (1998) 19 WAR 350 Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 60; (2001) 105 FCR 136 Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner [2019] FCA 461 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Lowery v Insurance Australia Ltd [2015] NSWCA 303; (2015) 90 NSWLR 320 Marshall v Smith [2013] WASC 432 Ran v The Queen (1996) 16 WAR 447 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 5) [2005] FCA 510; (2005) 216 ALR 147 Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2014] FCA 476
Date of hearing: 9 October 2019
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate