Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rainbow on behalf of the Kurtijar People v State of Queensland [2019] FCA 1683 File number: QUD 483 of 2015
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to file expert addendum report – where addendum report sought to qualify materially what expert agreed in joint expert report – where joint expert report prepared in accordance with Court's expert evidence practice note and with assistance of Registrar – where statement in joint expert report unambiguous – where no explanation why expert came to make addendum report three months after signing joint expert report and one month before trial – where allowing addendum report would revive substantial issue requiring further evidence
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 223 Expert Evidence Practice Note (GPN-EXPT)
Cases cited: Ansell Healthcare Products LLC v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 765 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303 National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Company Limited (The Ikarian Reefer) [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 68 Salzke v Khoury (2009) 74 NSWLR 580 Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2013] FCAFC 138
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate