Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BPQ15 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1834 Appeal from: BPQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 703
File number: WAD 207 of 2019
Judge: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - refusal to grant protection visa - definition of refugee - Tribunal's application of s 91R and s 91S of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (repealed) - threat to a person's life or liberty and serious harm - qualitative test applied - no jurisdictional error by Tribunal - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 91R, 91S, 424A, 430 Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Act 2014 (Cth) Schedule 5 Part 4
Cases cited: AKH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 47 ANL15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1365 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2019] HCA 16; (2019) 367 ALR 695 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZAPN [2015] HCA 22; (2015) 254 CLR 610 Minister for Immigration and Ethic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Murad v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 73; (2017) 250 FCR 510 VBAO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 60; (2006) 233 CLR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate