Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ritson v Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia [2019] FCA 1835 File number: NSD 1219 of 2019
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 11 September 2019
Cases cited: Burrell v R (2008) 238 CLR 218 Dib Group Pty Limited v Coolabah Tree Australia-Wide Pty Limited [2011] FCAFC 57 Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (No 3) [2019] FCA 853 Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378
Date of hearing: 11 September 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Amicus Curiae: Mr P Afshar
Solicitor for the Amicus Curiae: Coleman Greig lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1219 of 2019
BETWEEN: BRENDAN RITSON Applicant
AND: REGISTRAR OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 11 SEPTEMBER 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed as an abuse of the process of the Court. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT) RARES J: 1 This is an application for judicial review of the decision of a judicial registrar to reject for filing an interlocutory application that Brendan Ritson filed three weeks after a judge of the Court, on 6 June 2019, exercising the appellate jurisdiction, dismissed Mr Ritson's appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court with costs: Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (No 3) [2019] FCA 853.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate