Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chhantyal v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1869 Appeal from: Chhantyal v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 1054
File number: NSD 685 of 2019
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where applicant seeking to set aside decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to refusal to grant a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) (Subclass 602) visa – no error found – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 27 November 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms A Wong of Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
ORDERS NSD 685 of 2019
BETWEEN: BISHNU CHHANTYAL Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY Second Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 27 NOVEMBER 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate