Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liu v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1925 Appeal from: Liu v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 1638
File number: NSD 1024 of 2019
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 20 November 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether appellant satisfied requirements for Partner (Permanent) (Class BS) (Subclass 801) visa – whether primary judge misconstrued cl 806.211 of Schedule 2 of Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – no error in primary judge's reasoning – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 5F Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) cll 820.211, 820.221
Date of hearing: 19 November 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr L Karp
Solicitor for the Appellant: Australia United Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Reilly
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent submitted save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 1024 of 2019
BETWEEN: YUJIA LIU Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 20 November 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate