Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZVGQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1985 Appeal from: SZVGQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 597
File number(s): NSD 659 of 2018
Judge(s): FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia decision to dismiss judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse the appellant a Protection (Class XA) visa – where Tribunal found appellant has a well-found fear of persecution in India – whether treaty and administrative arrangements allow an Indian national to enter and reside in Nepal without passing through India –whether Tribunal correctly found that s 36(3) applies – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(5), 36(5A), 197C, 198 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1950
Cases cited: DED16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 18 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZUSU [2016] FCAFC 50; 237 FCR 305 Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship v SZRHU [2013] FCAFC 91; 215 FCR 35 MZZXS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1384 NBLC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 272; 149 FCR 151 SZMWQ v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 97; 187 FCR 109 SZTOX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 77 SZVGQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 73 SZVGQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 597 V856/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1018; 114 FCR 408
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate