Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 1990 Appeal from: Application for judicial review of the AAT decision delivered on 8 November 2018 by Dr L Bygrave
File number: NSD 852 of 2019
Judge: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – original decision by delegate of Minister not to revoke mandatory visa cancellation under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether jurisdictional error – whether the Tribunal thought "primary considerations" had to be given greater weight than "other considerations" under Direction 65 – whether Tribunal erred in giving less weight to the applicant's length of residence because the applicant had not spent time positively contributing to the Australian community – whether Tribunal failed to deal with critical claims raised – whether Tribunal made factual findings without evidence – application allowed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 477A, 499, 500, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) 43 FCR 280 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1222 FKP18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1555 Goundar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1203 Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 33 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123 Lu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 141 FCR 346 McAuliffe v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1992) 28 ALD 609 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 362 ALR 48 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ (2018) 363 ALR 325 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 93 ALJR 252 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1995) 57 FCR 432 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff M161/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319 SFGB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 231 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney (2012) 207 FCR 277 Suleiman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 594 SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 150 ALD 34 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 531 Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 257 CLR 22 Williams v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 226 FCR 112
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate