Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jata v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1998 Appeal from: Jata v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 1557
File number: VID 707 of 2019
Judge: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – whether the appellant made a clearly articulated submission to the Tribunal regarding time taken to process an application for a partner visa – whether the Tribunal failed to evaluate the submission – submission put clearly to the Tribunal – Tribunal gave appropriate consideration to appellant's circumstances – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 348, 357A(3), 360(1), 476 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) cl 820.21
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; 252 FCR 352 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 McNamara v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1096 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 MZYPZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 478; 127 ALD 510 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; 144 FCR 1 Politis v Commissioner of Taxation [1988] FCA 739; 16 ALD 707 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; 198 ALR 59 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3 SZSSC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 863; 142 ALD 150
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate