Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Healius Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 2011 File numbers: NSD 1750 of 2018 NSD 1752 of 2018 NSD 1753 of 2018 NSD 1754 of 2018 NSD 1755 of 2018
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 29 November 2019
Catchwords: TAXATION – deductibility of lump sum payments made to doctors in respect of contracts to conduct their practice at medical centres operated by Applicant for a certain period – where doctors would then pay a proportion of billings from patients to Applicant in exchange for use of premises and administrative services – whether lump sum outgoings of capital or of a capital nature under Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 8-1(1)(a) – character of advantage sought – means by which advantage to be used, relied upon or enjoyed – means adopted to obtain advantage CONTRACTS – interpretation of contracts – clause purporting to involve sale of doctors' practices and goodwill to Applicant – where Applicant itself unable to conduct a doctor's practice and where doctors would continue to practice at Applicant's medical centres – where goodwill inseparable from practice – where finding of clause being void for uncertainty would frustrate entire agreement and related agreement – consideration of relevant principles
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Pt 3-90, s 8-1 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZ
Cases cited: Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 20 FCR 288 Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers v Kerr [1946] 1 All ER 68 AusNet Transmission Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] HCA 25; 255 CLR 439 Box v Commissioner of Taxation [1952] HCA 61; 86 CLR 387 BP Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 112 CLR 386 Broken Hill Theatres Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1952) 85 CLR 423 CityLink Melbourne Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCAFC 272; 141 FCR 69 Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Company Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1953) 89 CLR 428 Commissioner of State Revenue (WA) v Placer Dome Inc [2018] HCA 59; 93 ALJR 65 Commissioner of Taxation v CityLink Melbourne Ltd [2006] HCA 35; 228 CLR 1 Commissioner of Taxation v Murry [1998] HCA 42; 193 CLR 605 Commissioner of Taxation v Sharpcan Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 36; 93 ALJR 1147 Commissioner of Taxation v South Australian Battery Makers Pty Ltd [1978] HCA 32; 140 CLR 645 Commissioner of Taxation v Star City Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 19; 175 FCR 39 Council of the Upper Hunter Country District v Australian Chilling & Freezing Co Limited [1968] HCA 8; 118 CLR 429 Geraghty v Minter [1979] HCA 42; 142 CLR 177 GP International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1990] HCA 25; 170 CLR 124 Hallstroms Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1946] HCA 34; 72 CLR 634 Handbury Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 141; 179 FCR 569 Heavy Minerals Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1966] HCA 60; 115 CLR 512 Idameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd v Angel-Honnibal [2002] NSWSC 1214 Idameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd v Gross [2012] NSWCA 423; 83 NSWLR 643 Kelsall Parsons & Co v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (1938) SC 238 Magna Alloys and Research Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1980] FCA 150; 49 FLR 183 National Australia Bank Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 80 FCR 352 Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 419; 186 FCR 301 Sidameneo (No 456) Pty Ltd v Alexander [2011] NSWCA 418 Sun Newspapers Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 337 Symbion Medical Centre Operations Pty Ltd v Alexander [2010] NSWSC 1047 Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1055; 67 ATR 63 Western Gold Mines NL v Commissioner of Taxation (WA) [1938] HCA 5; 59 CLR 729 Zahedpur v Idameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd [2016] QCA 134
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate