Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CPJ16 [2019] FCA 2033 Review of: BBFD v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] AATA 3907
File numbers: NSD 1141 of 2019 NSD 1664 of 2019
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 25 November 2019
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – applications for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal –where Tribunal set aside decision of delegate that refused to grant a protection visa under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where delegate required applicant to satisfy him of only one ground in s 501(6) as to whether she passed character test – where delegate not satisfied that applicant passed the character test under s 501(1) only because of risk that she would engage in criminal conduct in Australia under s 501(6)(d)(i) – whether scope of review in Tribunal under s 43(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) limited it to considering solely whether applicant passed the character test on ground that delegate decided adversely under s 501(6)(d)(i) for purpose of deciding whether to refuse to grant a visa under s 501(1) – where Tribunal had no power to extend review to consider other criteria in s 501(6) not considered or raised by delegate – where Tribunal remitted the protection visa application to Minister for reconsideration under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) with direction that applicant not be refused visa under s 501(1) MIGRATION – whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in overlooking or misunderstanding the applicant's admissions of contravening ss 197A and 235(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where no error of law in simply making a wrong finding of fact – where Tribunal not required to characterise applicant's past conduct as criminal in order to assess her risk in the future that she would engage in criminal conduct under s 501(6)(d)(i) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – applications for declaratory relief and writ of mandamus – where Minister's decision under s 501A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) only impediment to immediate grant of protection visa under s 65(1)(a) – where applicant's prolonged and continuing immigration detention pending determination of her application created sufficient urgency to justify imposing time limit for Minister to make decision under s 65(1)(a) – declaration that possible use of s 501A(2) does not prevent a grant of protection visa under s 65(1)(a)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate