Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZULE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 2136 Appeal from: SZULE & Anor v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 3280
File number: NSD 2307 of 2017
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – adverse findings as to credit – adverse findings explained and founded upon inconsistencies in evidence PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – need for judicial consideration of even poorly expressed arguments – undesirability of making unfounded conclusions without consideration of the claims sought to be made
Legislation: Constitution s 75(v) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 425, 476
Cases cited: AAM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 804, (2015) 231 FCR 452 ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 174, (2015) 250 FCR 109 AXL16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 208 AYG18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 454 BDS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1683 BEH15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 184 BZD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 94, (2018) 263 FCR 292 Chetcuti v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 112 CIT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 150, (2018) 265 FCR 572 COZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 46, (2018) 259 FCR 1 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146, (2016) 253 FCR 496 CQR17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 61 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2, (2018) 258 FCR 175 DQA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 2086 Gill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 51, (2017) 250 FCR 309 Kopalapillai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 547 Minister for Home Affairs v Ogawa [2019] FCAFC 98 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3, (2019) 93 ALJR 252 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18, (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16, (2010) 240 CLR 611 Nguyen v Migration Review Tribunal [2008] FCA 524 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50, (2015) 258 CLR 173 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cohen [2001] HCA 10, (2001) 75 ALJR 542 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1, (2000) 58 ALD 609 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte HB [2001] HCA 34, (2001) 179 ALR 513 SZKLO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 735, (2007) 102 ALD 115 SZOOR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 58, (2012) 202 FCR 1 SZQPE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 544, (2012) 205 FCR 437 SZSHV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 253 Kneebone S, The Refugee Review Tribunal and the Assessment of Credibility: an Inquisitorial Role? (1998) 5 AJ Admin L 78
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate