Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pike v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 2185 File number: QUD 618 of 2018
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2019
Catchwords: TAXATION – residency of taxpayer – where the taxpayer moved to Australia from Zimbabwe – where the taxpayer was first an Australian permanent resident for migration purposes and then an Australian citizen – where the taxpayer's de facto wife and children reside in Australia and are citizens – where the taxpayer lived and worked in Thailand for eight years – where the taxpayer subsequently lived and worked in Tanzania and the United Arab Emirates – where the taxpayer maintained a rented family home in Australia – where the taxpayer returned to Australia sporadically – definition of "resident" in s 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – ordinary meaning of "resident" – whether the taxpayer could be resident of two countries simultaneously according to its ordinary meaning TAXATION – residency of taxpayer – sub-paragraph (a)(i) of the definition of "resident" in s 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether the taxpayer was domiciled in Australia – s 10 of the Domicile Act 1982 (Cth) – whether the taxpayer formed an "intention to make his… home indefinitely" in Australia – degree of proof needed to prove a change in domicile – whether the Commissioner ought to have been satisfied that the taxpayer had definitely abandoned his Australian residence INTERNATIONAL LAW – TAXATION – interpretation of double taxation agreements – where Australia entered into a double taxation agreement with Thailand – where the taxpayer was a resident of both Thailand and Australia – where Article 4 of the double taxation agreement provides rules for deeming for tax purposes that a person resident of both Thailand and Australia will only be resident in one – application of Article 4 – whether the taxpayer has a permanent home in either Australia or Thailand – whether the taxpayer has a habitual abode in either Australia or Thailand – whether the taxpayer has closer personal and economic relations to Australia or Thailand
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate