Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 7) [2020] FCA 5 File number: NSD 1610 of 2016
Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 6 January 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 20(2) – whether single judge of the Federal Court of Australia lacks jurisdiction to determine whether Fair Work Commission has jurisdiction under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 20(2)
Cases cited: Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1976] 46 FLR 409; 2 ALD 60 Evans v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2014] FCA 491 JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCAFC 503; 201 FCR 297 Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited v Copyright Tribunal of Australia [2019] FCAFC 95 P v Child Support Registrar [2013] FCA 1089 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; 262 CLR 362
Date of hearing: 23 and 24 December 2019
Date of last submissions: 23 December 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 54
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr Toemoe of King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Martin appeared in person
ORDERS NSD 1610 of 2016
BETWEEN: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT AUSTRALIA Applicant
AND: TOM MARTIN Respondent
JUDGE: KERR J DATE OF ORDER: 6 January 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate