Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ZYVZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 28 Review from: ZYVZ and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] AATA 3967
File number: WAD 38 of 2019
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 24 January 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION - application to review decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal dismissing application to review delegate's decision to refuse to grant a protection visa - extension of time required for application - where applicant charged and convicted of gang rape and abduction offences committed outside of Australia prior to arrival in Australia - where applicant convicted in absentia - where Tribunal decided that there were serious reasons for considering that applicant had committed serious non-political crimes of gang rape and abduction as well as people smuggling - consideration of s 36(2C) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - consideration of standard of reasoning that will be 'serious reasons for considering' - that serious crimes had been committed - extension of time granted - review grounds as to serious reasons for considering applicant had committed crimes of rape and abduction not upheld - not necessary to determine review grounds as to whether people smuggling is a serious non-political crime - application for review dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 36, 233A, 233C, 476, 476A, 477A, 500 Criminal Procedure Act 2004 (WA) s 88 Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) s 617
Cases cited: Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] 1 AC 745 Arquita v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1889; (2000) 106 FCR 465 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1992] HCA 64; (1992) 176 CLR 1 CRI026 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 19 Ebatarinja v Deland [1998] HCA 62; (1998) 194 CLR 444 ETA067 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 46 FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26 Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2003] FCAFC 4; (2003) 127 FCR 130 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 HZCP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 202 JSDW and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] AATA 2420 Lipohar v The Queen [1999] HCA 65; (1999) 200 CLR 485 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Haq [2019] FCAFC 7 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20; (1995) 183 CLR 273 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Moti v The Queen [2011] HCA 50; (2011) 245 CLR 456 MZZZW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 133; (2015) 234 FCR 154 NAGV and NAGW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 6; (2005) 222 CLR 161 R v Abrahams (1895) 21 VLR 343 R v Gee [2012] SASCFC 86; (2012) 113 SASR 372 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 262 CLR 362
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate