Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Linchpin Capital Group Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 44 File number: QUD 439 of 2018
Judge: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 30 January 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – receivers – remuneration – degree of particularity required of supporting affidavit
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Mohamed v Hurstville Tower Medical Clinic Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 4 Park v Whyte (No 2) [2018] 2 Qd R 413 Re Solfire Pty Ltd (No 2) [1999] 2 Qd R 182 Venetian Nominees Pty Ltd v Conlan (1998) 20 WAR 96
Date of hearing: 30 January 2020
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Interested Persons: Mr L Copley
Solicitor for the Interested Persons: MinterEllison
Table of Corrections
14 April 2020 In paragraph 1 "Linchpin Capital Group Pty Ltd" has been replaced with "Linchpin Capital Group Ltd".
14 April 2020 In paragraph 1 "Endeavour Securities (Australia) Pty Ltd" has been replaced with "Endeavour Securities (Australia) Ltd".
14 April 2020 In paragraph 20 "who appears on behalf of the plaintiffs" has been replaced with "who appears on behalf of the applicants".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate