Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BLF16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 55 Appeal from: BLF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 1503
File number: NSD 1055 of 2019
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 6 February 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether the primary judge erred in not finding that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to consider an integer of the appellant's claim – whether the primary judge erred in finding that the appellant had not claimed that the fact of his membership of a political party increased his risk of harm
Cases cited: BLF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 1503
Date of hearing: 3 February 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr D Godwin
Solicitor for the Appellant: Brett Slater Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr T Reilly
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mills Oakley
ORDERS NSD 1055 of 2019
BETWEEN: BLF16 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 6 FEBRUARY 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed. 3. The name of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate