Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 61 Appeal from: Application for review of a migration decision
File number: VID 996 of 2018
Judge: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 7 February 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of a migration decision – cancellation of a visa on character grounds – application for revocation of cancellation decision – whether the decision was affected by legal unreasonableness – whether the decision-maker made findings of fact for which there was no evidence – whether the decision-maker failed to understand or address a submission advanced by the applicant – whether the decision-maker failed to take into account consequential and substantial evidence – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: BSE17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1926 CAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 155 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 362 ALR 48 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Schmidt v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 162 ALD 495 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Another (2016) 248 FCR 296
Date of hearing: 7 August 2019
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate