Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Site Skills Group Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (No 2) [2020] FCA 78 File number: QUD 233 of 2019
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 7 February 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs under r 25.14(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the respondent made an offer of compromise – whether the applicant acted unreasonably in not accepting that offer – costs ordered on an indemnity basis
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Site Skills Group Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2019] FCA 1970
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 5 December 2019
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr SA McLeod QC and Mr M Wilkinson
Solicitor for the Applicant: HopgoodGanim
Solicitor for the First Respondent: The First Respondent filed a Submitting Notice
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms M Brennan QC and Ms S Wright
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS QUD 233 of 2019
BETWEEN: SITE SKILLS GROUP PTY LTD ACN 153 744 417 Applicant
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL First Respondent
AUSTRALIAN SKILLS QUALITY AUTHORITY Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 7 February 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate