Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BEP19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 80 Appeal from: BEP19 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 2814
File number: QUD 652 of 2019
Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 6 February 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 7 February 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – application for protection visa – complementary protection – whether primary judge incorrect in upholding a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority in circumstances where the Authority found that the Appellant had engaged in political activities since his arrival in Australia for the purpose of strengthening his protection claims – submission no evidence to suggest that the Appellant did not also have a genuine political motivation for engaging in those activities – appeal dismissed MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – application for protection visa – leave sought to advance new ground not argued in court below – risk of Appellant's social media activity related to political activities engaged in since his arrival in Australia coming to the attention of the Vietnamese authorities if he were compelled to return – insufficient merit – insufficient explanation for failure to raise ground in court below in circumstances where Appellant had been legally represented – leave refused
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5J, 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa)
Cases cited: Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; 162 CLR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZLSP [2010] FCAFC 108
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate