Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 3) [2020] FCA 91 File number: NSD 1558 of 2012
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 10 February 2020
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application by applicants for costs of and incidental to an application for a reimbursement payment – application by applicants for further payment from settlement fund – application for leave to file an application against the litigation funder, outside time limit set – application for costs by Scheme Administrator
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 33V, 33ZF, 37M
Cases cited: Baffico v YMCA of Great Lakes Inc [2014] NSWCA 61 Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 2) [2018] FCA 527 Caason Investments Pty Ltd v International Litigation Partners No.3 Ltd [2018] FCAFC 176; (2018) 265 FCR 487 Darwalla Milling Co Pty Ltd & Ors v F Hoffman–La Roche Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2006] FCA 1388; (2006) 236 ALR 322 Goodwill Group Pty Ltd v Pongrass Associates Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1203 Goodwill Group Pty Ltd v Pongrass Associates Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 51 Jackson v Goldsmith [1950] HCA 22; (1950) 81 CLR 446 Pople v Evans [1969] 2 Ch 255 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Thirteenth Corp Pty Ltd v State [2006] FCA 979; (2006) 232 ALR 491 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 28; (2015) 256 CLR 507 Handley, Spencer Bower and Handley: Res Judicata (LexisNexis, 4th ed, 2009)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate