Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DRM18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 101 Appeal from: DRM18 v Minister for Immigration [2019] FCCA 2734
File number: NSD 1606 of 2019
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 6 February 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – unparticularised ground of appeal asserting jurisdictional error – re-agitation of the issues below as though this were a hearing de novo of the case advanced before the primary judge – no error demonstrated – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: DRM18 v Minister for Immigration [2019] FCCA 2734
Date of hearing: 6 February 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr L Leerdam of DLA Piper Australia
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 1606 of 2019
BETWEEN: DRM18 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: LEE J DATE OF ORDER: 6 FEBRUARY 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate