Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BlueScope Steel Limited v Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 113 File number: VID 1429 of 2016
Judge: BEACH J
Date of judgment: 11 February 2020
Catchwords: PATENTS – costs – apportionment of costs as between issues – consequential orders
Cases cited: BlueScope Steel Limited v Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 2117 Les Laboratories Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd (2016) 247 FCR 61
Date of hearing: On the papers
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicant and Cross-Respondent: Mr BN Caine QC and Ms C Cunliffe
Solicitor for the Applicant and Cross-Respondent: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondent and Cross-Claimant: Mr A Ryan SC and Mr JS Cooke
Solicitor for the Respondent and Cross-Claimant: Bird & Bird
ORDERS VID 1429 of 2016
BETWEEN: BLUESCOPE STEEL LIMITED ACN 000 011 058 Applicant
AND: DONGKUK STEEL MILL CO., LTD Defendant
AND BETWEEN: DONGKUK STEEL MILL CO., LTD Cross-Claimant
AND: BLUESCOPE STEEL LIMITED (ACN 000 011 058) Cross-Respondent
JUDGE: BEACH J DATE OF ORDER: 11 fEBRUARY 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate