Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Frigger v Trenfield (No 3) [2020] FCA 150 File number: WAD 141 of 2019
Judge: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 17 February 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for leave to amend originating application - discretion to grant leave - application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Insolvency Practice Rules (Bankruptcy) 2016 (Cth) rr 42-10, 42-15
Cases cited: Frigger v Trenfield [2019] FCA 1746 Frigger v Trenfield (No 2) [2019] FCA 2009 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 550; (2018) 359 ALR 564
Date of hearing: 17 February 2020
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicants: The applicants appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr SD Majteles
Solicitor for the Respondents: Carles Solicitors
ORDERS WAD 141 of 2019
BETWEEN: ANGELA CECILIA THERESA FRIGGER First Applicant
HARTMUT HUBERT JOSEF FRIGGER Second Applicant
AND: KELLY-ANNE TRENFIELD First Respondent
PAUL ANTHONY ALLEN Second Respondent
JUDGE: JACKSON J DATE OF ORDER: 17 FEBRUARY 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's interlocutory application for leave to amend the originating application to include a defamation claim is dismissed. 2. Costs are reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate