Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AFE18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 162 Appeal from: AFE18 v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 2225
File number: NSD 1625 of 2019
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 20 February 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for leave to rely on grounds of appeal not raised below — whether leave should be granted — whether satisfactory explanation for change of approach — potential prejudice to respondent — whether new grounds of sufficient merit to warrant grant of leave MIGRATION — appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia — fast track reviewable decision of Immigration Assessment Authority ("Authority") — where Authority decided not to consider "new information" — where grounds of appeal alleged that Authority adopted an unduly narrow construction of the term "exceptional circumstances" under s 473DD of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and that Authority's decision not to consider the information was legally unreasonable; that Authority made material findings of fact that were legally unreasonable; that Authority failed to consider appellant's claims cumulatively; that Authority failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to appellant's application — whether any ground had sufficient merit to warrant grant of leave
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 ss 5(1), 473CA, 473CB, 473CC(1), 473DB, 473DD, Pt 7AA Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1)(d)
Cases cited: AQU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 111; 162 ALD 442 Branir v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 254 FCR 221 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 Han v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 331 Khan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1478 M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 (2017) 254 FCR 534 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 (2017) 257 FCR 111 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 MZZJO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 239 FCR 436 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 267 FCR 200 SLMB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 129 University of Wollongong v Metwally [1985] HCA 28; 60 ALR 68 VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588 W352 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 398
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate