Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists [2020] FCA 214 File number: NSD 2068 of 2019
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2020
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law s 18, Schedule 2 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 139B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 31A, 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 r 16.01(c), 26.01
Cases cited: Bienstein v Bientstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Mehta [1975] 1 WLR 1087 Re Luck (2003) 203 ALR 1 Rozenblit v Vainer (2018) 262 CLR 478
Date of hearing: 19 February 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 42
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P Knowles
Solicitor for the Respondent: Moray & Agnew
ORDERS NSD 2068 of 2019
BETWEEN: SUJATHA CHANDRASEKARAN Applicant
AND: ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 19 FEBRUARY 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate