Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Raumakita v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 224 File number: NSD 1803 of 2019
Judge: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 28 February 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time pursuant to s 477A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where delegate of the Minister cancelled the applicant's visa pursuant to s 501(3A) – where the Minister refused to revoke the cancellation under s 501CA(4) – whether it is necessary in the interests of the administration of justice to extend time – application refused
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501(3A), 501(6), 501(7), 501CA, 501CA(4), 501CA(4)(b)(i), 501CA(4)(b)(ii), 477A(1), 477A(2)(b)
Cases cited: Afu v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1311 BZADJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 853 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Raumakita v R [2011] NSWCCA 126 SZTES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 719 SZTES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 158 SZRIQ v Federal Magistrates Court of Australia [2013] FCA 1284; (2013) 139 ALD 252
Date of hearing: 11 February 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate