Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VFWQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 230 Appeal from: VFWQ v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] AATA 1096
File number: WAD 344 of 2019
Judge: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 28 February 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION - citizenship application - where Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision of delegate to refuse the applicant citizenship on character grounds - date at which the Tribunal must assess character under s 21(2)(h) of Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) - where Tribunal said it assessed satisfaction as to good character as at date of delegate's decision - where Tribunal also referred to assessment of good character as at date of citizenship application - whether error by Tribunal comprised jurisdictional error - whether error material - whether description of applicant's conduct as 'calculated' indicated finding as to nature of dishonesty without evidentiary foundation - application allowed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43, 44 Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) ss 20, 21, 24, 52, 53
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1949) 78 CLR 353 BOY19 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 574 Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 456; (1993) 43 FCR 280 Commonwealth of Australia v Horsfall [2010] FCA 443; (2010) 185 FCR 66 Freeman v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1988) 19 FCR 342 Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2019] HCA 16 Gallacher v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] FCA 1123 Grass v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 44; (2015) 231 FCR 128 Harris v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 404; (2007) 158 FCR 252 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Irving v Minister of State for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 68 FCR 422 Kozanoglu v Pharmacy Board of Australia [2012] VSCA 295; (2012) 36 VR 656 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114; (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang [2003] HCA 11; (2003) 215 CLR 518 SFLB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1610 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31; (2008) 235 CLR 286 SZUWX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 77; (2016) 238 FCR 456 Tsvetnenko v United States of America [2019] FCAFC 74 Yu v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 209
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate