Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BPI17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2020] FCA 252 Appeal from: BPI17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 2657
File number: VID 1016 of 2019
Judge: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where Tribunal affirmed decision of Minister's delegate refusing grant of protection visa under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where primary judge failed to consider written submissions of the appellant and thereby failed to afford the appellant a fair hearing – whether matter should be remitted to the Federal Circuit Court for rehearing or should be determined by the Federal Court – where appellant's submissions raised new grounds of appeal – whether Tribunal reasons gave rise to an apprehension of bias – whether Tribunal failed to address claims raised by appellant – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 28 Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: AAM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 231 FCR 452 ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 250 FCR 109 ASIC v Reid (No 1) (2006) 151 FCR 540 BPI17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 637 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 EDI16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 171 Elliott v ASIC (2004) 10 VR 369 Embertee Pty Ltd v Energy Efficient Technologies Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 347 Foster v ACCC [2012] FCA 953 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQHH (2012) 200 FCR 223 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 78 ALD 224 NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328; 214 ALR 264 NSW v Canellis (1994) 181 CLR 309 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 R v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 73 ALD 1 Selvadurai v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 34 ALD 347 Sharma v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 256 FCR 1 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 SZKLO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 102 ALD 115 SZQFS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1244 SZRUI v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 80 SZULE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 2136 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate