Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 257 File number: VID 1390 of 2017
Judge: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 4 March 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for confidentiality orders over documents filed in support of settlement approval pursuant to s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether orders necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – whether orders of indefinite 'until further order' appropriate – orders granted
Legislation: Class Actions Practice Note (GPN-CA) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG(1)(a) and (d) and 37AI
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish [1980] FCA 40; (1980) 29 ALR 228; (1980) at 230; 43 FLR 129 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCA 1082 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Origin Energy Electricity Limited [2015] FCA 278 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 1406 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761; 282 ALR 246 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 5) [2016] FCA 741 Bradgate (Trustee) v Ashley Services Group Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 1210 Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 2) [2018] FCA 527 City of Swan v McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc [2016] FCA 343 Clarke v Sandhurst Trustees Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 511 Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66 Collin v Aspen Pharmacare Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 952 Collin v Aspen Pharmacare Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1336 Cyclopet Pty Ltd v Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation [2012] FCA 1326 Dillon v RBS Group (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 395 Gibson v Malaysian Airline System Berhad [2019] FCA 1007 Hardy v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 3) [2017] FCA 1165 HFPS Pty Limited (Trustee) v Tamaya Resources Limited (in Liq) (No 3) [2017] FCA 650 Hodges v Sandhurst Trustees Limited [2018] FCA 1346 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2009) 177 FCR 205 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 Hopkins v AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (No 8) [2016] FCA 1096 Hopkins v Macmahon Holdings Ltd [2018] FCA 2061 Inabu Pty Ltd v Leighton Holdings Limited [2014] FCA 622 Keyzer v La Trobe University [2019] FCA 646 Kuterba v Sirtex Medical Limited (No 3) [2019] FCA 1374 Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited v S&P Global Inc (Formerly McGraw-hill Financial, Inc) (A Company Incorporated in New York) [2018] FCA 379 McKenzie v Cash Converters International Ltd (No 4) [2019] FCA 166; 134 ACSR 327 Newstart 123 Pty Ltd v Billabong International Ltd [2016] FCA 1194; 343 ALR 662 Perazzoli v Bank SA, a Division of Westpac Banking Corporation Limited [2019] FCA 1707 Rushleigh Services Pty Ltd v Forge Group Limited (in Liquidation)(Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2019] FCA 2113 Santa Trade Concerns Pty Limited v Robinson (No 2) [2018] FCA 1491 Simpson v Thorn Australia Pty Ltd Trading As Radio Rentals (No 5) [2019] FCA 2196 Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 12) [2010] FCA 62 Steelforce Trading Pty Ltd v Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 47 Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Burrup Holdings Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 1304
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate