Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Guardian Offshore AU Pty Ltd v Saab Seaeye Leopard 1702 Remotely Operated Vehicle Lately On Board The Ship 'Offshore Guardian' [2020] FCA 273 File number: WAD 461 of 2019
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 9 March 2020
Catchwords: ADMIRALTY - application to dismiss proceedings for want of jurisdiction and for arrest to be set aside - where warrant issued for arrest of remote operated vehicle - whether arrested ROV is the ship named in arrest warrant - whether defendant was at all material times the true owner of arrested ROV - whether the ROV is a ship under definition in s 3 of Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth) - proceedings dismissed - arrest set aside
Legislation: Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth) ss 3, 17, 18, 19 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 8.21 Admiralty Court Act 1861 (UK) s 2
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27 Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2014] HCA 42; (2014) 254 CLR 247 Bridge Shipping Pty Ltd v Grand Shipping SA [1991] HCA 45; (1991) 173 CLR 231 Canada v St John Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co Ltd (1981) 126 DLR (3d) 353 Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55; (2012) 250 CLR 503 Cook v Dredging & Construction Co Ltd [1958] 1 Lloyd's Rep 334 Cyber Sea Technologies Inc v Underwater Harvester Remotely Operated Vehicle 2002 FCT 794 Elbe Shipping SA v The Ship 'Global Peace' [2006] FCA 954; (2006) 154 FCR 439 Lacey v Attorney General (Qld) [2011] HCA 10; (2011) 242 CLR 573 Marine Craft Constructors Ltd v Erland Blomqvist (Engineers) Ltd (1953) 1 Ll L Rep 514 Merchants Marine Insurance Co Ltd v North of England Protecting and Indemnity Association (1926) 26 Ll L Rep 201 Michael v Musgrave (trading as Ynys Ribs) (The 'Sea Eagle') [2011] EWHC 1438 Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 14; (2004) 218 CLR 273 Owners of the Ship 'Shin Kobe Maru' v Empire Shipping Company Inc [1994] HCA 54; (1994) 181 CLR 404 Polpen Shipping Co Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Co Ltd (1942) 74 Ll L Rep 157 R v Goodwin [2005] EWCA Crim 3184 Steedman v Scofield [1992] 2 Lloyd's Rep 163 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 262 CLR 362 Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Victoria [2016] HCA 4 The Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Iran Amanat' v KMP Coastal Oil Pte Limited [1999] HCA 11; (1999) 196 CLR 130 The 'Von Rocks' [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep 198 Tisand Pty Ltd v The Owners of the Ship MV 'Cape Moreton' (ex 'Freya') [2005] FCAFC 68; (2005) 143 FCR 43 Wells v Owners of the Gas Float Whitton (No 2) [1897] AC 337
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate