Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Limited [2020] FCA 308 File number: NSD 628 of 2017
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2020
Catchwords: COMPETITION – proposal to establish rival day surgery to existing day surgery and private hospital in Coffs Harbour – alleged misuse of market power and exclusive dealing in contravention of ss 46 and 47 respectively of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – failure to establish to the requisite standard that the pleaded conduct, which related to certain conversations, involved contravening conduct EVIDENCE – application under ss 135 and 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to exclude or restrict parts of evidence given prior to retrieval of a sound recording – unfair prejudice not established in circumstances where relevant witnesses could be recalled and cross-examined on the basis of the sound recording
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 46, 47 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 135, 136, 140
Cases cited: ASX Operations Pty Ltd v Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd (No 1) (1991) 27 FCR 460 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 10) [2013] FCA 322 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1459 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 149; 129 FCR 339 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Boral Ltd [1999] FCA 1318; 166 ALR 410 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 909; 310 ALR 165 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Flight Centre Travel Group Limited [2016] HCA 49; 261 CLR 203 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Little Company of Mary Health Care Limited [2015] FCA 1144 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Limited [2018] FCAFC 78; 356 ALR 582 Boral Besser Masonry v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 5; 215 CLR 374 Dandy Power Equipment Pty Ltd v Mercury Marine Pty Ltd (1982) 64 FLR 238 Dowling v Dalgety Australia Ltd (1992) 34 FCR 109 Eastern Express Pty Limited v General Newspapers Pty Limited (1992) 35 FCR 43 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; 243 CLR 361 Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 13; 205 CLR 1 Monroe Topple & Associates Pty Ltd v Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia [2002] FCAFC 197; 122 FCR 110 News Ltd v South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Ltd [2003] HCA 45;215 CLR 563 NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power and Water Authority [2004] HCA 98; 219 CLR 90 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 Queensland Wire Industries Pty Limited v Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd [1989] HCA 6; 167 CLR 177 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; 216 CLR 53 Seven Network Ltd v News Limited (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348; 224 ALR 317 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (2009) [2009] FCAFC 166; 182 FCR 160 Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority [2000] FCA 1381; ATPR 41-783 SWB Family Credit Union Ltd v Parramatta Tourist Services Pty Ltd [1980] FCA 125; 48 FLR 445 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v ACCC [2003] FCAFC 193; 131 FCR 529 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate