Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
EHT17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 309 Appeal from: EHT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 2617
File number: NSD 1566 of 2019
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 25 February 2020
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 91M, 91N, 91P, 91Q,
Cases cited: Lee v Lee (2019) 372 ALR 383 Minister for Immigration v SZSSJ (2016) 259 CLR 180 Re Canavan (2017) 263 CLR 284 SZOAU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 199 FCR 448
Date of hearing: 25 February 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant was self-represented via an interpreter
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr DA Hughes
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
ORDERS NSD 1566 of 2019
BETWEEN: EHT17 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 25 february 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)
RARES J: 1 This is an appeal from the decision of the Federal Circuit Court refusing the appellant Constitutional writ relief against the decision of the Minister's delegate made on 7 September 2017 to reject as invalid the appellant's application for a protection (subclause 866) visa: EHT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 2617.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate